Spatial analysis of poor groups' access to urban services (Case: Urmia City)

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Studies, Institute of Research and Development of Human Sciences (Department),
2 Assistant professor at Urmia University
Abstract
The city's livability largely depends on its capacity to meet the residents’ basic needs. One of the essential components of public welfare is the ability of residents to access urban services on a neighborhood scale. This research aims at evaluating the accessibility of different socio-economic groups to urban services. Fair distribution of urban resources and services among socio-economic groups is an issue that needs attention, especially for developing countries with rapid urbanization like Iran. In this research, various methods have been used to analyze the correlation between accessibility to services and urban poverty and to provide the information needed for better decision-making. 21 social, economic, and physical indicators of statistical blocks have been used to map urban poverty. In order to map the accessibility of urban services, criteria such as the capacity of urban services (park, educational, religious, therapeutic, and sports), population density, and distance to services are considered. The results show a negative correlation between accessibility to services and urban poverty in Urmia city. The highest intensity of negative correlation between accessibility to services and urban poverty belongs to educational services (r=-0.231). This situation is not compatible with the goals of sustainable development and equal access to urban services. In this article, the areas of the city that need attention are identified on the map, which will be useful in the future planning and development of the city.

Keywords

Subjects


- Ansari, M., Vali Shariat Panahi, M., Malek Hosseini, A., Madiri, M. (1400) Modeling the factors affecting the realization of the principles of smart growth in the city of Malair, The Journal of Spatial Planning, 25 (2): 1-34. (In Persian)
- Asdi, I., Maliki, P. (2018) Explaining the spatial relationship between subjective and objective walkability of urban neighborhoods (case example: Districts 4, 8 and 13 of Tehran). The Journal of Spatial Planning, 23(4):147-191. (In Persian)
- Ashik, F. R., Mim, S. A., & Neema, M. N. (2019). Measuring an integrated spatial accessibility index for urban facilities in DCC area. International conference on engineering research and practice (iCERP2019), Dhaka, Bangladesh (pp. 19–22). January 2019; STAMCA: Sydney, Australia, 2019.
- Ashik, F. R., Mim, S. A., & Neema, M. N. 2020. Towards vertical spatial equity of urban facilities: An integration of spatial and aspatial accessibility. Journal of Urban Management, 9(1), 77–92.
- Baud, I., Sridharan, N., & Pfeffer, K. (2008). Mapping urban poverty for local governance in an Indian mega-city: The case of Delhi. Urban Studies, 45(7), 1385-1412.
- Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. 2009. Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787.
- Chang, H. S., & Liao, C. H. 2011. Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28(5), 361–371.
- Cho, C. M. 2003. Study on effects of resident-perceived neighborhood boundaries on public services: Accessibility & its relation to utilization: Using Geographic Information System focusing on the case of public parks in Austin. Texas: Texas A & M University.
- Cohen, B. 2006. Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in Society, 28, 63–80.
- Dadashpoor, H., Rostami, F. and Alizadeh, B., 2016. Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city. Cities, 52, pp.159-172.
- Dai, D. 2011. Racial/Ethnic and Socio-economic Disparities in Urban Green Space Accessibility: Where to Intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4), 234-244.
- De la Espriella, C. (2009). A technique for small-area poverty analyses. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2399-2421.
- Esfandiar, Z., Ramezani, R. (2015) Measuring urban poverty and its relationship with access to urban services in Qazvin city, Journal of Fine Arts-Architecture and Urban Development, 21(2), 54-45. (In Persian)
- Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Planning Institute, 25, 73–76.
- Holloway SR, Bryan D, Chabot R, Rogers DM, Rulli J.1998. Exploring the effect of public housing on the concentration of poverty in Columbus, Ohio. Urban Aff Rev. 33(6):767–89.
- Joseph, A. E., & Phillips, D. R. (1984). Accessibility and utilization—geographical perspectives on health care delivery. New York: Happer & Row Publishers.
- Kelobonyea, K., McCarneya, G., Xia, J., Swapan, M. S. H., Mao, F., & Zhoua, H. (2019). Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 75, 82–93.
- Kelobonyea, K., McCarneya, G., Xia, J., Swapan, M. S. H., Mao, F., & Zhoua, H. 2019. Relative accessibility analysis for key land uses: A spatial equity perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 75, 82–93.
- Kwan, M. P., & Weber, J. (2003). Individual accessibility revisited: Implications for geographical analysis in the twenty-first century. Geographical Analysis, 35(4), 313–341.
- La Rosa, D., Takatori, C., Shimizu, H., & Privitera, R. 2018. A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustainable cities and society, 36, 346-362.
- Lee, J., & Miller, H. J. (2018). Measuring the impacts of new public transit services on space-time accessibility: An analysis of transit system redesign and new bus rapid transit in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Applied Geography, 93(February), 47–63.
- Lindsey, G., Maraj, M., & Kuan, S. C. (2001). Access, equity, and urban greenways: An exploratory investigation. The Professional Geographer, 53(5), 332–346.
- Lindsey, G., Maraj, M., & Kuan, S. C. 2001. Access, equity, and urban greenways: An exploratory investigation'. The Professional Geographer, 53(5), 332–346.
- Lotfi, S. and Koohsari, M.J., 2009. Measuring objective accessibility to neighborhood facilities in the city (A case study: Zone 6 in Tehran, Iran). Cities, 26(3), pp.133-140.
- Lotfi, S., Hasanalizadeh, M. (2019) Spatial analysis of urban poverty in urban spaces (case study: Noorabad city), Danesh Zemin magazine, 11(1), 152-168. (In Persian)
- Lucas, K., & Jones, P. 2012. Social impacts and equity issues in transport: An introduction. Journal of Transport Geography, 21, 1–3.
- Mayaud, J. R., Tran, M., & Nuttall, R. 2019. An Urban Data Framework for Assessing Equity in Cities: Comparing Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities in Cascadia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 78, 1-12.
- Mehdanjad, H., Bayat, M. (2019) The effect of urban poverty on access to urban services, a case study: Shahryar city, Journal of Sustainable City, 3(3), 51-66. (In Persian)
- Mitchell, D. (1996). Introduction: Public space and the city. Urban Geography, 17(2), 127–131.
- Moser, C., Gatehouse, M., & Garcia, H. (1996). Urban management and poverty reduction: First module: indicators of urban poverty.
- Movahhed, A., V. N., Hataminejad, H., Zanganeh, A., Kaman Rudi, K. M. (2015) Spatial analysis of urban poverty in Tehran metropolis, Journal of Economics and Urban Management, 4 (3), 19-37. (In Persian)
- Nicholls, S., & Shafer, C. S. 2001. Measuring accessibility and equity in a local park system: The utility of geospatial technologies to park and recreation professionals. Journal of Park and Recreation.
- Omer, I. 2006. Evaluating accessibility using house-level data: A spatial equity perspective. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(3), 254–274.
- Penchansky, R., & Thomas, J. W. (1981). The concept of access. Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Medical Care, 19(2), 127–140.
- Rafiyan, M., Khodaei, Z., Dadashpour, H., Taqvai, A. A. (2015) Analysis of the level of attachment of adolescents to public urban environments with an emphasis on the capacity of local communities (socio-spatial), The Journal of Spatial Planning, 20 (2): 169-190. (In Persian)
- Rustaie, Sh., Ahadanjadroshti, M., Asghari Z, A., Zanganeh, A.(2017) Spatial distribution of urban poverty in Kermanshah city, Journal of social welfare, 12 (45), 91-71. (In Persian)
- Sabokbar, H.F., Mohammadi, H., Tahmasbi, S., Rafii, Y. and Hosseini, A., 2021. Measuring spatial accessibility and equity to healthcare services using fuzzy inference system. Applied Geography, 136, p.102584.
- Saurman, E. (2015). Improving access: Modifying Penchansky and Thomas's theory of access. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 21(1), 36–39.
- Smoyer Tomic, K.E., Hewko, J N H M J, 2004. Spatial accessibility and equity of playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada, vol 48. Can. Geogr.
- Soleimani, M. H., Zandi, R., Akbari; E. (1400) Zoning and spatial analysis of urban poverty using spatial analysis and ANP model (case study: Mashhad city), Applied Research Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(60), 258-239. (In Persian)
- Taleai, M., Sliuzas, R., & Flacke, J. 2014. An integrated framework to evaluate the equity of urban public facilities using spatial multi-criteria analysis. Cities, 40, 56–69.
- Tsou, K. W., Hung, Y. T., & Chang, Y. L. 2005. An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22(6), 424–435.
- Wachs, M., & Kumagai, T. G. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Economic Planning Sciences, 7, 437–456.
- Wang, F., & Luo, W. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 865–884.
- Wang, F., & Luo, W. (2005). Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: Towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health & Place, 11, 131–146.
- Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
- Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Tang, Z. (2017). An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai–Implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape and urban planning, 157, 393-383.
- Yuan, Y., Xu, J., & Wang, Z. 2017. Spatial equity measure on urban ecological space layout based on accessibility of socially vulnerable groups—a case study of Changting, China. Sustainability, 9, 1552.
- Zanganeh, A., Talkhabi, H., Gazrani, F., Yousefi, F, M. (2014) Spatial extents of urban poverty in Arak", Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 2(1), 107-93. (In Persian).