Ranking of Nature-based Tourism Capacity in Mountainous Regions, Case Study: Eastern Region of Lorestan Province

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
R. Alizadeh
H. Izady
M. Arasteh
Department of Urban Planning and Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Introduction

Nature-based tourism is responsible for travel to natural areas and seeks to preserve the environment and welfare of local communities. In general, this type of tourism can play an important role in the economic development of the regions. In order to take advantage of the benefits of tourism, one of the primary and basic steps in nature-based tourism planning is identifying capabilities, determining capacity and ranking areas for the development of this type of tourism. Lorestan province is known as one of the high-potential regions in the field of nature-based tourism in Iran, whose capacities have not been well used. The purpose of this study is to first identify and determine the criteria and indicators for ranking nature-based tourism capacities based on previous research and their localization and then their use in ranking the capacity of nature-oriented tourism in the county of the eastern region of Lorestan province. Finally, several solutions have been proposed to improve the spatial structure of nature-oriented tourism in the study area.

Methodology

This research is applied and its approach is descriptive-analytical. The data required for this research have been collected by documentary and field methods (questionnaire). Criteria and indicators required for ranking the studied counties have been obtained by reviewing the literature in domestic and foreign research and the opinion of local experts. The best-worst technique has been used to weigh the selected criteria (Rezaei, 2015). The best and worst criteria have been determined by 15 experts and by comparing the criteria according to Saaty's 1-9 scales and then the final weight of the 12 selected criteria from the experts' point of view has been calculated using Lingo software. Finally, ARAS multi-criteria decision making method was used to rank the nature-based tourism capacity of the counties in the study area. This technique is one of the multi-criteria decision making techniques that was first proposed by Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas and Zenonas Turskis in 2010.



Results and Discussion

The results obtained from the weighting of the selected criteria show that the number of nature-oriented tourist attractions (0.235), altitude (0.092) and protected areas (0.077) are ranked first to third. Accommodation centers (0.077), safety (0.072), tourism growth rate (0.070), quality of communication routes (0.067), distance from health centers (0.066), existence of relief groups (0.063), different methods of transportation (0.061), distance of attractions from the city (0.048), the size of cities (0.042) and distance of attractions from cultural centers (0.030) are in the next ranks, respectively. Also, the results obtained from using the ARAS method show that the counties of Khorramabad (0.616), Aligudarz (0.544) and Boroujerd (0.500), Dorud (0.450) and Azna (0.406) are in the first to fifth ranks respectively in terms of nature-based tourism capacity.



Conclusion

The purpose of this study was to rank the counties in the eastern region of Lorestan province and to determine the tourism routes and to present the proposed special organization for the development of this region based on nature-based tourism. For this purpose, a number of domestic and foreign researches in the field of nature-oriented tourism were reviewed and the criteria were extracted for ranking the nature-based tourism capacity of the study area. The weight of the criteria was determined by using the paired comparison method and best-worst technique using Lingo software. Then, using one of the multi-criteria decision-making methods) ARAS), the eastern counties of Lorestan province were ranked based on the capacity of nature-based tourism. The results show that Khorramabad, Aligudarz and Boroujerd counties were in higher ranks, respectively. The counties of Dorud and Azna were in the lower ranks, respectively, due to the weakness of their public tourism infrastructure, despite having numerous and unique nature-based attractions. Overall, the results of this study can provide a better understanding of the nature-based tourism, capabilities of this region for planners, decision makers and stakeholders and private investors (domestic and foreign). Providing infrastructure, facilities and equipment are essential in order to optimally exploit the potential of nature-based tourism in the region and also play a more effective role in regional development.

The following suggestions are offered in order to improve the spatial structure of nature-based tourism in the study area:

- Establishment of eco-tourism resorts in the place of nature-based tourist attractions,

- Establishment of protected areas in the oak forests of the region,

- Definition and determination of hiking trails in nature between attractions that are close to each other,

-Creating nature-oriented adventure recreation sites in the region,

- Improving the existing accommodation and reception centers as well as creating new centers in the study area.

This research has faced some limitations. One of the most important limitations of the research was the lack of cooperation of some organizations and also the lack of a suitable and relevant database in Lorestan province and these restrictions eventually led to the elimination of the three criteria of security and the amount of governmental and non-governmental investment.



Finally, in order to complete this research, future research is suggested as follows:

- Identifying weaknesses, strengths, opportunities and threats in the field of nature-based tourism, and strategic planning for the development of this type of tourism in the study area and Lorestan province,

- Identifying the potential capacity of various sub-sectors of nature-based tourism (sports, adventure, etc.) in the study area and Lorestan province and planning to implement them.

Keywords

Subjects

1. Ahmadian Nohadani, S, Mokhtari Karchagani, A "Strategic Priorities of Economic Development with an Emphasis on Ecotourism in Khur va Biabanak, Isfahan". The Journal of Spatial Planning, 69-76, (2019) (In Persian).
2. Alaeddinoglu, F., & Selcuk Can, A, "Identification and Classification of Nature-Based Tourism Resources: Western Lake Van Basin, Turkey". Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 198–207. (2011), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.124.
3. Ars, M., & Bohanec, M, Towards the Ecotourism: "A Decision Support Model for the Assessment of Sustainability of Mountain Huts in the Alps". Environmental Management, 91(12), 2554-2564, (2010) doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.006.
4. Arsic, S., Nikolic, D., Mihajlovic, I., Fedajev, A., & Zivković, Z, "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia". Ecological Economics, 85-95. (2018)
5. Asadpouriuan, Z; Rahimian, M; Gholamrezai, S, " Identification of Criteria and Assessment of the Level of Sustainable Ecotourism Development in Tourism Poles of Lorestan Province", Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, Volume 50, Number 3, pp 483-499, (2019) 10.22059/IJAEDR.2019.267477.668666 (In Persian).
6. Ashok, S, "Development of Ecotourism Sustainability Assessment Framework Employing Delphi, C&I and Participatory Methods: A Case Study of KBR, West Sikkim, India". Tourism Management Perspectives, 21, 24-41, (2017), doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2016.10.005.
7. Bazm Ara Balashti, M., Tavakoli, M., Jafarzadeh, K "Assessing Appropriate Areas for Ecotourism Development of Protcted Areas (Case Study: Khaeez Protected Area" The Journal of Spatial Planning, 95-118, (2017) (In Persian).
8. Bunruamkaew, K., & Murayama, Y, "Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS&AHP: a Case Study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand". Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 269-278, (2011) doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.024.
9. Castellanos-Verdugo, M., Vega-V Azquez, M., Oviedo-Garcia, M., & Orgaz-Aguera, F, "The Relevance of Psychological Factor in the Ecotourist Experience Satisfaction Through Ecotourist Site Perceived value". Cleaner Production, 226-235, (2016) doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.126.
10. Cenamor, I., de la Rosa, T., Nunez, S., & Borrajo, D, "Planning for Tourism Routes Using Social Networks". Expert Systems With Applications, 1-9, (2017) doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.10.030.
11. Claudia, T.-S., Gonzalez, J., Breta, M. L., & Christopher, "A,Social-Ecological Factors Influencing Tourist Satisfactions in Three Ecotourism Lodges in the Southeastern Peruvian Amazon". Tourism Management, 545-552, (2012) doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2011.06.008.
12. Cobbinah, P., Amenuvor, D., Black, R., & Peprah, C, "Ecotourism in the Kakum Conservation Area, Ghana: Local politics, practice and outcome". Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 34-44, (2017), doi:10.1016/j.jort.2017.09.003.
13. Denstadli, J., Kr, J., & Jacobsen, S, "The Long and Winding Roads: Perceived Quality of Scenic Tourism Routes". Tourism Management 780-789, (2011)
14. Zavadskas, EK, Turskis, Z, "A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making", Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 159-172, (2010)
15. Fatolahi, J; Kafili, V, Tagizadegan, A, " Development gap in Provinces of Iran", Development Economics and Planning, Volume 6, Number 1, pp 99-118, (2017) (In Persian).
16. Fredman, P., Wall-Reinius, S., & Grunde´n, A, "The Nature of Nature in Nature-Based". Hospitality and Tourism, 289–309, (2012) doi:10.1080/15022250.2012.752893.
17. Ghaedrahmati, S; Khavarian Garmsir, A. "Strategic Planning for Tourism Development in Yazd City, Using Meta-SWOT Model", The Journal of Spatial Planning, Volume 20, Number 1, PP 179-205, (2016) (In Persian).
18. Gholipour, Y; Sayadi, A, "Strategic Planning of Sustainable Ecotourism in Small Towns Using SWOT and QSPM Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models (Case Study: Masal, Gilan)", Journal of Urban Management Studies, Volume 11, Number 37, pp 1-16, (2019) (In Persian).
19. Ghorbani nia kheibari, V; MirSanjari, M; Liaghati, H, "Evaluating Ecotourism Potential Development in Dena County using Multi-criteria Evaluation of Specific Hybrid Indices", Journal of Rangeland, Volume 12, Number 3, pp 316-329, (2018) (In Persian).
20. Gigoyi, L., Pamucar, D., Lukic, D., & Markovic, S, "GIS-Fuzzy DEMATEL MCDA Model for the Evaluation of the Sites for Ecotourism Development: A Case Study of “Dunavski kljuc” Region, Serbia". Landuse Policy, 348-365, (2016) doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.030.
21. Hsu, P.h, "Economic Impact of Wetland Ecotourism: An Empirical Study of Taiwan's Cigu Lagoon Area". Tourism Management Perspectives, 31-40, (2019)
22. Khavarian Garmsir, A; Zhaklin, E; Olian, M., " Strategic Planning of Urban Tourism Development with use SOAR Strategic Model (case study Taft city)", The Journal of Spatial Planning , Volume 17, Number 3, PP 127-144, (2013) (In Persian).
23. Khoshtaria, T., & Chachava, N, "Prospects of Ecotourism Development in Recreation Area of South Georgia". Annals of Agrarian Science, 312-317, (2017), doi:10.1016/j.aasci.2017.07.004.
24. Khosrojerdi, M; Nouri Pour, M, "Identifying Rural Tourism Development Strategies for Doroodzan District: The Integration of Strategic Planning and Artificial Neural Network", The Journal of Spatial Planning, Volume 21, Number 1, PP 167-196, (2017) (In Persian).
25. Kutut, V., Zavadskas, E., & Lazauskas, M, "Assessment of Priority Options for Preservation of Historic City Centre Buildings Using MCDM (ARAS)". 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques,MBMST 2013, 657 – 661, (2013), doi:10.3846/1648715X.2014.889771.
26. L. Saaty, T, "Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process". Services Sciences, 83-98, (2008)
27. Li, W, "Environmental Management Indicators for Ecotourism in China’s Nature Reserves:A Case Study in Tianmushan Nature Reserve". Tourism Management, 559–564, (2004), doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2003.06.001.
28. Madbumita, d., & Chatterjee, b, "Ecotourism: a Panacea or a Predicament?" . Tourism Management, 3-16, (2015) , doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2015.01.002.
29. Mallick, S., Rudra, S., & Samanta, R, "Sustainable Ecotourism Development Using SWOT and QSPM Approach": A Study on Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. Pre-Proof, (2020), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.001.
30. Mohammadian Mosammam, h., Sarrafi, m., Tavakoli Nia, j., & Heidari, , "Typology of the Ecotourism Development Approach and an Evaliation from the Sustainability View: the Case of Mazandaran Province", Iran. Tourism Management Perspectives, 168-178, (2016), doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2016.03.004.
31. Mohammadpour, A, "Qualitative Research Method (Scientific Steps and Procedures in Qualitative Methodology)", Volume 2, Sociological Publication of Tehran, (2013) (In Persian).
32. Mutana, S., & Mukwada, G, "Mountain-Route Tourism and Sustainability. A Discourse Analysis of Literature and Possible Future Research". Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 59-65, (2018), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2018.08.003.
33. Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J., Ombe, J., & Geen Escoto, M, "Sustainable Ecotourism Indicators with Fuzzy Delphi Method – A Philippine Perspective". Ecological Indicators, 874-888, (2018), doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060.
34. Oliaei, Mohammad Sadegh; Khazaei, Kazem, "Evaluation of Lorestan Cities in Terms of Tourism Development Indicators", Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography, Volume 10, Number 1, pp 305-320(In Persian), (2017).
35. Osman, T., Shaw, D., & Kenawy, E, "Examining the Extent to Which Stakeholder Collaboration During Ecotourism Planning Processes Could be Applied Within an Egyptian Context". Land Use Policy 126-137, (2018), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.043.
36. Rahbaran, Zahra, "Get to know Lorestan Province Better", https://www.kojaro.com/2018/7/23/154035, (2018) (In Persian).
37. Rezaei, J, "Best-Worstmulti-Criteriadecision-Makingmethod". Omega, 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
38. Sepahvand, R; Jaafari, M; Sepahvand, L; Ahmadi, A, " Strategic Planning for Development of Rural Ecotourism (Case Study: Bisheh Station Village)", Human Geography Research Quarterly, Volume 50, pp 263-267, (2018) (In Persian).
39. Tseng, M.-L., Lin, C., Remen Lin, C.-W., Wu, K.-J., & Sriphon, T, "Ecotourism Development in Thailand: Community Participation Leads to the Value of Attractions Using Linguistic Preferences". Cleaner Production, 1319-1329, (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.305.
40. Weaver, D, Sustainable Tourism: Theory and Practice. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, (2006)
41. Wu, X., Guan, H., Han, Y., & Ma, J, "A Tour Route Planning Model for Tourism Experience Utility Maximization". Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 1-8, (2017), doi:10.1177/1687814017732309.
42. Xiang, C., Xiao qin, J., & Yin, L, "Study on the Rural Ecotourism Resource Evaluation System". Environmental Technology & Innovation, 101-131, (2020), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101131
43. Xiao, Z., Sen, L., Yunfei, F., Bin, L., Boyuan, Z., & Bang, L, "Tourism Route Decision Support Based on Neural Net Buffer Analysis". Procedia Computer Science, 243-247, (2017) . doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.086.
44. Yekani Motlagh, E., Hajjarian, M., Hossein Zadeh, O., & Alijanpour, A, "The Difference of Expert Opinion on the Forest-Based Ecotourism Development in Developed Countries and Iran". Land Use Policy, (2020) . doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104549.
45. Zabihi, H., Alizadeh, M., D. Wolf, I., Karami, M., Ahmad, A., & Salamian, H, "A GIS-Based Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) for Ecotourism Suitability Decision Making: A Case Study of Babol in Iran". Tourism Management Perspectives, 1-17, (2020), doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100726,
46. Zhang, H., & Lai Lei, S, "A Structural Model of Residents’ Intention to Participate in Ecotourism: The Case of a Wetland Community". Tourism Management, 33(4), 916-925, (2012), doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2011.09.012,
47. Ziaei, M., Banykamali, S., Sharifi Kya, M "Ecological Capability Evaluation and Purpose of Ecotourism Development (A case study of : Minoodasht area)". The Journal of Spatial Planning, 109-128, (2012) (In Persian).
The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics
Volume 25, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 117-142