Introduction of a new model for assessing the environmental risk of dams during construction using EFMEA and VIKOR combination methods (case study of the Balarood Dam in Khuzestan

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
S. darvishi 1
S. A. Jozi 2
S. Malmasi 3
S. Rezaian 4
1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch,Tehran,
2 Full Professor, Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch,Tehran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch,Tehran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Environment, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood Branch, Shahrood
Abstract
Dam construction and development projectshave serious effects on environmental parameters. Therefore, environmental risk assessment of the dam is one of the most important aspects of environmental risk management in these projects. The purpose of this study is to provide a new model for assessing the environmental risks of dams during the construction phase. To this end, after identifying environmental risks and using the EFMEA method, the RPN for each environmental aspect was calculated and classified. The VIKOR method was used to assess and prioritize identified environmental risks. The results show that in the EFMEA method and by comparing the calculated risks, the risk of pollution of the Balarood river with, RPN 125 is the first priority. In the VIKOR method, the risk of water pollution (high, medium, low) with weight (1,300, 1,000 and 0,700) was identified as the most important risk. In this paper, EFMEA and VIKOR methods are used to assess the environmental risk of the dam. The most important modified action to reduce environmental risks is the construction and completion of wastewater treatment plants for industrial units.

Keywords

Subjects

ابراهیم پور ازبری، م؛ اکبری، م؛ عبداللهی، ع؛ موحد منش، و. 1396. ارائه چارچوبی برای ارزیابی عملکرد مدیران با استفاده از تاپسیس فازی و تحلیل پوششی داده های فازی. مجله تحقیق در عملیات در کاربردهای آن، سال چهاردهم، شماره چهارم، صفحه 107-86.
احمد آبادی، ع؛ قاسمی، ک.۱۳۹۵. کاربرد روش های تصمیم گیری چند معیاره در ارزیابی آسیب پذیری مساکن شهری در برابر زلزله با تاکید بر روش VIKOR، فصلنامه مدیریت بحران. شماره نهم، صفحه ۱۱۱-۱۰۳.
امین زاده گوهر ریزی، ب؛ امین زاده گوهر ریزی، ب؛ رستگار، س. 1393. ارائه الگوریتم تلفیقی برای حل مسائل تحلیل تناسب کاربری اراضی با رویکرد تصمیم گیری چند هدفه. فصلنامه برنامه ریزی و آمایش فضا، دوره هجده، شماره یک، صفحه 24-1.
سازمان آب و برق خوزستان. ۱۳۸۹. گزارش ارزیابی تفصیلی محیط زیستی سد مخزنی بالارود. صفحه ۲۹۳-۱.
فرج زاده اصل، م؛ رستم زاده، ه. 1386. ارزیابی اثر سدهای بزرگ در تغییر کاربری اراضی با استفاده از سنجش از دور و GIS (مطالعه موردی: سد ستار خان اهر). . فصلنامه برنامه ریزی و آمایش فضا، دوره یازده، شماره یک، صفحه 66-47.
Ang C, Xin S, Dongsheng W, Wengen L, and Jie T.2014.A Brief Review on Post-project Environmental Appraisals of Dam
Projects and Recommendations for China. Advanced Materials Research.Vols 955-959,pp 3451-3456.
Azadeh A and Mohammad Fam I. 2009. "Integrated M HSEE Management Systems For Industry: A Case Study In Gas Refinary". Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers .J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 32: 235-241. )doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2009.9671500.(
Bai J, Cui B, Xu X, Gao H and Ding Q. 2009. "Heavy metal contamination in riverine soils upstream and downstream of a hydroelectric dam on the Lancang River", China. Environmental Engineering Science. 26: 941-6.) doi.org/10.1089/ees.2008.0136.(
Bluvband Z, Ltd A, and Dagan B. 2004. Expanded FMEA (EFMEA). Oren Nakar, MOTOROLA
Israel Ltd., Tel-Aviv. 0-7803-8215-3/04/$17.00.
Danielsson M and Gunnarsson S A. 2001. Guideline for Implementation of Environment Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method, Marmait Publish. Sofia, Bulgaria. 127PP.
Dipper B. 2010. "Monitoring and Post-auditing in Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review".Jornal Environmental Planning and management. 41: 731-747. )doi.org/10.1080/09640569811399.(
Harrald JR, Renda-Tanali I, Shaw G. L, Rubin CB and Yeletaysi S. 2006. Review of risk
based prioritization/decision making. Methodologies for dams. The Georg Washington University Institute for Crisis Disaster and Risk Management, 1776GS4 NW suite110, Washington DC.
Heller, S., 2006. Managing industrial risk-having a tasted and proven system to prevent and assess risk. J. Hazard Mater., 130(1-2):58-63). DOI: 10.22034/GJESM.2016.02.04.004 .(
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F and Fallahnejad R.2010. "Imprecise Shannon’s Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making". Entropy. 12: 53-62. )https://doi.org/10.3390/e12010053.(
Hui (2000), “Environmental monitoring and audit: past, present, future”, paper presented at IAIA ‘00 Back to the Future conference, EIA Follow-up Stream, Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre, 19–23 June, Hong Kong.
Jahromi B and Raei M R.2012. "Portfolio optimization using a hybrid of fuzzy ANP, VIKOR and TOPSIS". Management Science LettersslanruoJ lanoisseforP dna cifitneicS . 2:2473–2484. )DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2012.07.019.(
Jozi, S.A.; Saffarian, Sh.; Shafiee, M.; Moradi Majd, N., (2014). Safety, health, and environmental risk assessment of a gas power plant: A case study from southern Iran. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assesstnem., 21(6):1479-1495.
Khuzestan Water and Power Organization. 1389. Environmental Impact Assessment Report of the Balarood Reservoir Dam. pp:293-1. (Persian)
Morales-Torres, A.; Serrano-Lombillo, A.; Escuder-Bueno, I.; Altarejos-García, L., 2016. "The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management". Structure and infrastructure engineering: Maintenance management, life cycle design and performance, 1465-1476 )DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2015.1136830(.
Olsen S.I.2001."Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemical-A Methodological Impact Assessment". Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 21 (4): 385–404.
Opricovic S and Tzeng G.H. 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods". European Journal of Operational Research.178: 514-529. )DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020(
Rezaian S, Jozi SA, and Zaredar N. 2016. Environmental risk assessment of a dam during con-
struction phase. Global J Environ Sci Manage 2:345–56. 10.22034/GJESM.2016.02.04.004
Samaras, G.D.; Gkanas, N.I.; Vitsa, K.C., (2014). "Assessing risk in dam projects using AHP and ELECTRE I". Int. J. Constr. Manage. 14(4), 255-266. )DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2014.971942.(
Shaffiee Haghshenas S, Lashteh Neshaei M.A, Pourkazem p, Shaffiee Haghshenas S.2016. Civil Engineering Journal. Vol 2, No 4.
Sharifikia M., Shayan S., Eftekhari S M., Karam A. 1396. "River morphological changes analysis caused by Taleqan Dam counteraction –based on remote sensing time deferential data". The Journal of Spatial Planning.21 (2). 243-263. (Persian)
Shahroodi K, Alipour H and Faramarzi L. 2013. "Providing a Mathematical Decision Making Model (Based on MCDM1) for Selecting Stocks (A Case Study: Saderat, Tejarat, and Mellat Banks in Rasht, Iran)"; Anthesis Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences. 1: 196-204
Wang Q.G, Du Y.H and Su K.Q. 2012. Chen. Environmental Impact Post-Assessment of Dam and Reservoir Projects: A Review. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 13:1439-1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2012.01.135
Zhang H, Chen G and Luo Y.2010. Basin hydropower development environmental impact poste- assement theory frame and considerations. Environmental science and management. 35:176-8.
The Journal of Spatial Planning and Geomatics
Volume 23, Issue 4
December 2019
Pages 37-61