تبیین ارتباط مکانی بین قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی و عینی محلات شهری (نمونه موردی: مناطق4، 8 و 13 شهر تهران)

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی اصیل

نویسندگان
دانشگاه مازندران، دانشکده هنر و معماری، گروه شهرسازی
چکیده
هدف این تحقیق کشف ترجیحات مردم نسبت به فضاهای پیاده‌‌مدار و سنجش قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی و عینی و تبیین ارتباط مکانی آنها در محلات مناطق4، 8 و 13 شهر تهران است. این پژوهش از نظر روش‌شناسی در دستۀ تحقیقات توصیفی و اکتشافی قرار دارد که با رهیافت پژوهش‌‌های کمی انجام شده است. از داده های سرشماری، کاربری زمین، شبکه ارتباطی و داده‌‌های حاصل از نظرسنجی بهره گرفته شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر کلیه جمعیت و همه محلات مناطق 22 گانه شهر تهران است. نمونه‌‌های آماری آن که به روش هدفمند انتخاب شدند شامل 31 محله هستند. یافته‌‌های این تحقیق در ارتباط با ترجیحات مردم نسبت به فضاهای پیاده‌‌مدار همسو با سایر تحقیقات بوده است و ساکنان شهر تهران در ارتباط با موضوع پیاده‌‌روی همانند مردمان سایر نقاط دنیا فضاهای دارای دسترسی مناسب به خدمات، امکانات و زیرساخت‌‌های مورد نیاز زندگی روزمره، محیط‌‌های ایمن، جذاب، سرزنده، شاداب، عاری از آلودگی و ترافیک، وجود فضاهای مناسب و تعریف شده برای پیاده‌‌روی را برای پیاده‌‌روی مناسب می‌‌دانند. یافته‌‌ها در ارتباط با شکاف بین پیاده‌‌مداری عینی و ذهنی نشان داد که به غیر از مؤلفه مکان‌‌هایی برای پیاده‌‌روی و دوچرخه‌‌سواری بقیه ابعاد مطالعه شده از جمله مدت زمان دسترسی به مغازه‌‌ها یا فروشگاه‌‌ها، تسهیلات و غیره، دسترسی به خدمات؛ خیابان‌‌های محله؛ محیط محله؛ امنیت ادارک شده از ترافیک؛ امنیت ادارک شده از جرم؛ و میران رضایت از محله در ارتباط با سنجش پیاده‌‌مداری ذهنی میانگین بالاتری در محلات با پیاده‌‌مداری عینی بالا در مقایسه با محلات با قابلیت پیاده‌‌مداری عینی پایین داشته‌‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


1. Abdollahi A.A, Fatahi M. (2017). Evaluation of smart urban growth indicators using ELEKTRE technique (Case study: regions of Kerman city). MJSP. 21 (2):147-171 URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-21-11656-fa.html (In Persian)
2. Adams, M. A., Todd, M., Kurka, J., Conway, T. L., Cain, K. L., Frank, L. D., & Sallis, J. F. (2015). Patterns of walkability, transit, and recreation environment for physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine, 49(6), 878-887.
3. Arvidsson, D., Kawakami, N., Ohlsson, H., & Sundquist, K. (2012). Physical activity and concordance between objective and perceived walkability. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 44(2), 280-7.
4. Asadi R, shahabian P. (2017). Planning and Assessing the Walkability of Tajrish Metro stations by ANP & QFD. MJSP. 21 (1):253-278 URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-21-10776-fa.html (In Persian)
5. Azadi Ghatar. S, Meshkini, A., Eftekhari, R.A., Mostafavi E., Ahadnejad Reveshti M. (2017). Explanation of Relationship between Urban Walkability and Death Spatial Distribution caused by Colorectal and Breast Cancer. MJSP. 21 (3):55-94 URL: http://journals.modares.ac.ir/article-21-6831-fa.html (In Persian)
6. Azmi, D. I., & Karim, H. A. (2018). Promoting Sustainable Urban Neighborhood towards Walkability. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 3(8), 167-175.
7. Bauman, A. E., Reis, R. S., Sallis, J. F., Wells, J. C., Loos, R. J., Martin, B. W., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?. The lancet, 380(9838), 258-271.
8. Cerin E, Cain KL, Conway TL, Van Dyck D, Hinckson E, Schipperijn J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, Davey RC, Hino AA, Mitáš J, Orzanco-Garralda R, Salvo D, Sarmiento OL, Christiansen LB, Macfarlane DJ, Schofield G, Sallis JF. (2014). Neighborhood environments and objectively measured physical activity in 11 countries. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 46(12): 2253–64.
9. Cerin, E., Macfarlane, D. J., KO, H. H., & Chan, K. C. A. (2007). Measuring perceived neighbourhood walkability in Hong Kong. Cities, 24(3), 209-217.
10. Cerin, E., Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., & Frank, L. D. (2006). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: validity and development of a short form. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 38(9), 1682-1691.
11. Ding, D., & Gebel, K. (2012). Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature? Health & place, 18(1), 100-105.
12. Eom, H. J., & Cho, G. H. (2015). Exploring thresholds of built environment characteristics for walkable communities: Empirical evidence from the Seoul Metropolitan area. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 40, 76-86.
13. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American planning association, 76(3), 265-294.
14. Ferrer, S., & Ruiz, T. (2018). The impact of the built environment on the decision to walk for short trips: Evidence from two Spanish cities. Transport policy, 67, 111-120.
15. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American planning Association, 72(1), 75-87.
16. Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Saelens, B. E., Leary, L., Cain, K., Conway, T. L., & Hess, P. M. (2010). The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British journal of sports medicine, 44(13), 924-933.
17. Hirsch, J. A., Moore, K. A., Evenson, K. R., Rodriguez, D. A., & Roux, A. V. D. (2013). Walk Score® and Transit Score® and walking in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. American journal of preventive medicine, 45(2), 158-166.
18. Khoshdel, A. R., Ziaei, M., Ghaffari, H. R., Azadi, S., & Alimohamadi, Y. (2018). The Prediction Number of New Cases and Death of Gastric Cancer among Iranian Military Community during 2007-2019. Multidisciplinary Cancer Investigation, 2(2), 14-19.
19. King, W. C., Brach, J. S., Belle, S., Killingsworth, R., Fenton, M., & Kriska, A. M. (2003). The relationship between convenience of destinations and walking levels in older women. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 74-82.
20. Lee, H. S., & Park, E. Y. (2015). Use of Neighborhood Facilities and Perception of Walking Environment in Older Rural Women-Focused on the Chungnam Province. Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning, 21(3), 59-66.
21. Lee, S., Sung, H., & Woo, A. (2017). The Spatial Variations of Relationship between Built Environment and Pedestrian Volume: Focused on the 2009 Seoul Pedestrian Flow Survey in Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1), 147-154.
22. Leslie, E., Saelens, B., Frank, L., Owen, N., Bauman, A., Coffee, N., & Hugo, G. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health & place, 11(3), 227-236.
23. Lotfi, S., & Koohsari, M. J. (2011). Neighborhood walkability in a city within a developing country. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 137(4), 402-408.
24. Mansfield, Theodore J. (2016). Health impacts of transportation and the built environment: A quantitative risk assessment (Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
25. Martínez-Martínez, O. A., & Ramírez-López, A. (2018). Walkability and the built environment: validation of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) for urban areas in Mexico. Quality & Quantity, 52(2), 703-718.
26. Moeini, S. M. (2006). Increasing walkability: steps towards a more human city, HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 27(27) - Serial Number 1192, pp 5-16. (In Persian)
27. Mohammadi, S. and Mahin N. (2015). An Analysis of the association between urban form and Public Health: emphasizing of resident’s movement patterns, Third International Congress on Civil Engineering, Urban Architecture and Development, Tehran. https://www .civilica.com / Paper-ICSAU03-ICSAU03_1676.html (In Persian).
28. Nielsen, T. A. S., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2018). Bikeability–Urban structures supporting cycling. Effects of local, urban and regional scale urban form factors on cycling from home and workplace locations in Denmark. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 36-44.
29. Nyunt, M. S. Z., Shuvo, F. K., Eng, J. Y., Yap, K. B., Scherer, S., Hee, L. M., ... & Ng, T. P. (2015). Objective and subjective measures of neighborhood environment (NE): relationships with transportation physical activity among older persons. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 12(1), 108.
30. Reza Zadeh R., Esfandiar Z. And Latifi Scuya, L. (2011). Perceptual measurement of neighborhood walkability and its influential factors in neighborhoods (Case study: Chizar neighborhood), Urban Management, 9(28) pp 297 -313. (In Persian)
31. Rigolon, A., Toker, Z., & Gasparian, N. (2018). Who has more walkable routes to parks? An environmental justice study of Safe Routes to Parks in neighborhoods of Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(4), 576-591.
32. Rosso, A. L., Auchincloss, A. H., & Michael, Y. L. (2011). The urban built environment and mobility in older adults: a comprehensive review. Journal of aging research, 2011.
33. Saelens, B. E., Sallis, J. F., Black, J., & Chen, D. (2002). Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS).
34. Safari Shali, R. and Habibpour, K. 2012. Comprehensive Guide to SPSS in Survey Research (Quantitative Data Analysis), Tehran: Loyeh publications. (In Persian)
35. Sahafnia, B. (2008). Measuring the policy effects of building urban trails in promoting quality of the urban environment (case study: tarbiat tabriz tabriz), Master thesis of Urban Planning, Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian).
36. Statistics Center of Iran (2011). Census blocks data of Tehran city.
37. Sung, H., & Lee, S. (2015). Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 318-329.
38. Tajik, A., and Partovi, P. (2014). Walkability Conceptual Model and Analytical Framework with the Emphasis on New Urbanism Approach (case study: 4th phase of Mehrshahr). Motaleate Shahri, 3(9), 81-96. (In Persian).
39. Tehran Municipality ICT Organization. (2010). Urban land use base maps, GIS Department.
40. Tehran Municipality ICT Organization. (2012). Urban Road layer, GIS Department.
41. Tuckel, P., & Milczarski, W. (2015). Walk ScoreTM, perceived neighborhood walkability, and walking in the US. American journal of health behavior, 39(2), 242-256.
42. Wang, Y., Chau, C. K., Ng, W. Y., & Leung, T. M. (2016). A review on the effects of physical built environment attributes on enhancing walking and cycling activity levels within residential neighborhoods. Cities, 50, 1-15.
43. Wen, M., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2006). Objective and perceived neighborhood environment, individual SES and psychosocial factors, and self-rated health: An analysis of older adults in Cook County, Illinois. Social science & medicine, 63(10), 2575-2590.
44. www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.htm