واکاویِ ناممکنی دست‌یابی به هم‌رأیی در فرآیند تصمیم ـ ‌سازی برنامه-ریزی به میانجیِ انگاشت‌هایِ «امر واقع» لکانی و «امر سیاسی» موفِ

Abazari, Y (1998)., The reason of sociology, Tehran, Tarhe- No Publisher [In Persian]
Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000). ‘New labour, new planning? The trajectory of planning in Blair’s Britain’. Urban Studies, 37 (8), 1379–1402 (doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080171).
Ashoori, D (2010)., Humanities dictionary, Tehran, Markaz Publisher [In Persian]
Barry, B (2001). Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism, Cambridge: Polity Press (DOI: 10.1177/009059102237038).
Beck U (1997), The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order, Cambridge, Polity Press (doi/10.1086/231416).
Benhabib, S. (1992) ‘Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition and Jurgen Habermas’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 73–98. Cambridge: MIT Press (doi/10.1177/136843101004002005).
Briand, M. (1999) Practical Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press (doi=10.1.1.1027.7664&rep=rep1).
Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press (doi/abs/10.1177/0261018316655934).
Caudill, D (2000), Lacan’s social psychoanalysis, In The subject of Lacan, edited by K. Malone and S. Friedlander, Albany, State University of New York Press. 297-315 (/doi/full/10.1080/14649350410001691763).
Elster, J. (1993) Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (doi/abs/10.1111/pops.12466).
Evans, D (1996), An introductory dictionary of Lacanian psychoanalysis, Routledge press (doi/abs/10.1177/00030651980460021007).
Flynn, W T. (2011), Debating Deliberative Democracy: How Deliberation changes the way people Reason’, a thesis submitted in the fulfillment of the degree Doctor of philosophy (PhD), University of York: Department of politics (doi:10.1111/j.1467).
Ghaderi, H (2002)., Political thought in 20th century, Samt Publisher [In Persian].
Giddens A (1994), Beyond Left and Right, Stanford University Press. (doi/abs/10.1177/000169939503800110)
Gunder M (2010) ‘Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space’. Planning Theory 9 (4) 298–314 (doi/10.1177/1473095210368878).
Gunder, M (2002), Bridging theory and practice in planning education: A story from New Zealand, Australian Planner, 39 (4), 200-204 (doi/pdf/10.1080/07293682.2002.9982320).
Gunder, M (2003), Passionate planning for the others’ desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning, Progress in Planning, 60 (3), 235-322 (doi/10.1177/147309520323005).
Gunder, M (2004), Shaping the Planner’s Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning Education, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23 (1), 299-314 (doi/10.1177/0739456X03261284).
Habermas, J. (1971a) Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. London: Heinemann (doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035001011).
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press (doi/abs/10.1177/0270467688008004109).
Habermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press (doi/abs/10.1177/0270467688008004109).
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (doi/abs/10.1177/095269519801100305).
Habermas, J. (1993) Justification and Application. Cambridge: Polity (doi/full/10.1111/1478-9302.12101_10).
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity (doi/10.1086/231139).
Habermas, J. (1998) The Inclusion of the Other. Cambridge: Polity (doi.org/10.2307/2586029).
Habermas, J. (2001a) The Liberating Power of Symbols. Cambridge: Polity (doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511488979).
Habermas, J. (2001b) The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge: Polity (doi/full/10.1111/1467-8675.00258).
Hersij, H and Hajizadeh, J (2010)., deliberative democaracy in Habermass philosophical Thoughts, Journal of Wisdom and Philosophy, Vol.20. No.3[In Persian]
Hillier, J (2003), ‘Agonizing ’over consensus:why Habermasian ideals cannot be real ,Planning heory, Vol 2 (1):37–59 (DOI - identifier, 10.1177/1473095203002001005).
Hillier, J and M. Gunder (2003), Planning fantasies? An exploration of a potential Lacanian framework for understanding development assessment planning, Planning Theory, 2 (3), 225-48 (doi/10.1177/147309520323005).
Kaplan, P (2000)., psychology of development, Transalted by Mehrdad Firoozbakht, Rasa Publisher [In Persian]
Lacan, J (1977), Ecrits, Norton, London (doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4679 (200005)).
Lacan, J (1988a), The seminar, book I, 1953-1954, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01593).
Lacan, J (1988b), The seminar, book II, 1954-1955, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01593).
Lacan, J (1998), The seminar, book XX, 1972-1973, Norton, New York (https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01593).
Lacan, J (2002), Ecrits, Norton, London (doi/10.1177/1350508410364095).
Lacan, J. (1977) Ecrits, trans. A. Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton (doi.org/10.1037/h0091160).
Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation (s). London: Verso (doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00459.x).
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso (doi/abs/10.1177/072551368701600118).
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (2002) ‘Hope, Passion, Politics’, in M. Zournazi (ed.) Hope, pp. 122–49. Sydney: Pluto (doi/full/10.1080/17405904.2016.1182933?src=recsys).
McCarthy, T. (1978) The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press (doi.org/10.2307/2130496).
McGuirk, P. (2001) ‘Situating Communicative Planning Theory: Context, Power, and Knowledge’, Environment and Planning A 33 (2): 195–218 (/doi/10.1068/a3355).
Mouffe, C. (1993) The Return of the Political. London: Verso (https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695118787697).
Mouffe, C. (1996) ‘Deconstruction, Pragmatism and the Politics of Democracy’, in C. Mouffe (ed.) Deconstruction and Pragmatism, pp. 1–12. London: Routledge (doi/10.1111/j.1468-0378.1994.tb00001.x).
Mouffe, C. (1997) ‘Democratic Identity and Pluralist Politics’, in R. Bontekoe and . Stepaniants (eds) Justice and Democracy, pp. 381–93. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press (https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095203002001005).
Mouffe, C. (1999) ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?’, Social Research 66 (3): 745–58 (DOI: 10.1177/0191453709343385).
Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso (DOI: 10.1080/14616700600980728).
Mouffe, C. (2001–2) ‘Democracy – Radical and Plural’, CSD Bulletin 9 (1): 10–13 (doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.896555).
Mouffe, C. (2002) ‘Which Kind of Space for a Democratic Habitus?’, in J. Hillier and E. Rooksby (eds) Habitus: A Sense of Place, pp. 93–100. Aldershot: Ashgate (doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00734_1. x.).
Mouffe, C. (2005) On the political, Routledge, London (doi: 10.24297/jps.).
Newman, S. (2001) From Bakunin to Lacan. Oxford: Lexington (doi:10.1353/pmc.2002.0028).
Outhwaite, W (2006)., Habermas A Critical Introduction, Second Edition, Transalted by Leila Joafshani and Hasan Chavoshian, Akhtaran Publisher [In Persian]
Outhwaite, W (2006)., Habermas A Critical Introduction, Second Edition, Transalted by Leila Joafshani and Hasan Chavoshian, Akhtaran Publisher [In Persian]
Rescher, N. (1993) Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus. Oxford: Clarendon Press (DOI, 10.1023/A:1005334729094).
Sanyal, B (2002), Globalization, ethical compromise and planning theory, Planning Theory, 1 (2), 116-23 (https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100202).
Sennett, Richard (1997). The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. New York: Norton (/doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1973.9971841).
Stavrakakis Y (2009) Psychoanalysis and ideology: Comments on R.D. Hinshelwood. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 14 (2): 149–163 (doi:10.1057/pcs.2008.40).
Stavrakakis, Y (1991)., Lacan and the Political, Transalted by Mohammad Ali Jafari, Goghnoos Publisher [In Persian]
Stavrakakis, Y. (1999) Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge (ISBN-13: 978-0415171878).
Tajbakhsh, K. (2001) The Promise of the City. Berkeley: University of California Press (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00828_2.x.).
Taylor N (2009) Tensions and contradictions left and right: The predictable disappointments of planning under New Labour in historical perspective. Planning Practice and Research 24 (1): 57–70 (https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450902742155).
Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Thomas, H. (1998) ‘Collaborative Action in Local Planmaking: Planners’ Perceptions of Planning through Debate’, Environment and Planning B 25 (1): 127–44 (https://doi.org/10.1068/b250127).
Torfing, J. (1999) New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell (New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek) (doi: 978-0-631-19558-0).
Warren, M. (1995) ‘The Self in Discursive Democracy’, in S. White (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, pp. 167–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052144120X).
Wolin, S. (1996) ‘Fugitive Democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (doi/10.2307/2998618).
Zizek, S (2006), How to read Lacan, London, Verso, 14-30 (doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2017.1299565).
Zizek, S. (1997) The Abyss of Freedom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press (doi: 10.3998/mpub.11193).